Do You Agree with the View Presented in Source 9 That Critics of the Second Boer War

Do you agree with the view presented in source 9 that critics of the consequence Boer War were wrong to say that the submersion camps were part of the deliberate use of the methods of barbarism Explain your answer, utilize sources 7, 8 and 9 and your own knowledge. 40 marks The intentness camps during the second Boer War were set up in 1900 after several policies were introduced by Kitchener in response to the Guerrilla warfare, and were not intended as places of punishment.In fact, they were set up to provide food, water, entertainment and most of all protection for families during this time. Over the years more opinions have risen on the conditions in these concentration camps and although, as stated by Andrew Roberts, they were not purposely set up as part of the deliberate use of methods of barbarism, this theory has been challenged by many.Robert Ensor, who wrote that the camps were grossly mismanaged and Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman who stated that war is unfair when it is carried on by methods of barbarism, are both blossom examples of how there are extremely diverse views on the purpose of the concentration camps during the Second Boer War. It is apparent that concentration camps during the Second Boer War were set up to protect individuals and families kinda than punish them. In many ways the concentration camps were places of safety and hope for the Boers affected by this war, and to an extent attendance was not compulsory.Andrew Roberts, who wrote Salisbury twee Titan seems to support this view stating that food, shelter, clothing and above all, protection were offered and that attendance was normally voluntary, and as he was a historian who was specialised, knowledgeable and educated in this subject, it is likely that this information is correct to an extent. Kitchener introduced concentration camps to shelter families, and did not intend them to turn into such a terrible unexpected by-product of irregular war as stated by the book which w as published in 1999.This suggests that it was written for information purposes rather than morale or propaganda, therefore signifying that the information included would not be exaggerated for this reason, and the fact it was written such a long time after the concentration camps took place, it allowed him time to make a judgement, although this could lease secondary information which he had misinterpreted, therefore making the source less reliable and perhaps sort of biased.