Cheating and Plagiarism - It’s Not Plagiarism, It’s Recycling :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Its non Plagiarism, Its Recycling   What does plagiarism squander to do with Shakespeare, Marlowe, Ovids metamorphosis, Titus Andronicus, Revenge Tragedies, Adam, Eve and the apple, and The Tempest? All these and many more are the result of plagiarism.   There seems to be a great discussion on whether or not Shakespeare is the true author of the acquires associated with his name. The internet seems to be full of essays, discussion boards and book reviews all traffic with this circumstance topic and most of the tidy sum submitting them are very forceful and definitive about their positions. In just a few hours of searching I found well over a thousand pages dealing with the original source of the plant of art assigned to Shakespeares name. The most disappointing part was that nvirtuoso of the essays I read even suggested the possibility of Shakespeare just borrowing information and topics from opposite playwrights and authors. They were all mainly interested in the man who actually rove the words on paper. Not simply did this decrease their usefulness for this particular paper but also they made it seem like the person who wrote the plays start on paper had some particular lawful ownership over them. This was not true though.   During the time that Shakespeare was writing plays in England, there were no such(prenominal) laws deeming a play protected by copyright laws. Today, plays are normally published and distributed but in the Elizabethan era, plays were only written enough for the actors to bunco their lines. When plays were put on there was usually a large audience. This audience could have included other playwrights and actors who would then remember pieces of what they saw and use them later(prenominal) in their own productions. How could this be secure?   Back then, actors were lucky if they did not get stopped by the police while performing a play why would the ideas of a playwright be protected by law? I do not thi nk anyone even cared if the plays were used as resources for other plays. If Shakespeare used a part from one of Marlowes plays, then Marlowe could take some ideas from Shakespeare. Since most of the ideas for plays came from famous works anyway, whos to say that Shakespeares idea was even his own?   Ovids Metamorphosis is one of the most referenced works in the plays we have read already in class.Cheating and Plagiarism - Its Not Plagiarism, Its Recycling Argumentative Persuasive Topics Its Not Plagiarism, Its Recycling   What does plagiarism have to do with Shakespeare, Marlowe, Ovids Metamorphosis, Titus Andronicus, Revenge Tragedies, Adam, Eve and the apple, and The Tempest? All these and many more are the result of plagiarism.   There seems to be a great discussion on whether or not Shakespeare is the true author of the plays associated with his name. The internet seems to be full of essays, discussion boards and book reviews all dealing with this particular topic and most of the people submitting them are very forceful and definitive about their positions. In just a few hours of searching I found well over a thousand pages dealing with the original source of the works of art assigned to Shakespeares name. The most disappointing part was that no(prenominal) of the essays I read even suggested the possibility of Shakespeare just borrowing information and topics from other playwrights and authors. They were all mainly interested in the man who actually put the words on paper. Not only did this decrease their usefulness for this particular paper but also they made it seem like the person who wrote the plays down on paper had some particular lawful ownership over them. This was not true though.   During the time that Shakespeare was writing plays in England, there were no such laws deeming a play protected by copyright laws. Today, plays are usually published and distributed but in the Elizabethan era, plays were only written enough for the actors to learn their lines. When plays were put on there was usually a large audience. This audience could have included other playwrights and actors who would then remember pieces of what they saw and use them later in their own productions. How could this be copyrighted?   Back then, actors were lucky if they did not get stopped by the police while performing a play why would the ideas of a playwright be protected by law? I do not think anyone even cared if the plays were used as resources for other plays. If Shakespeare used a part from one of Marlowes plays, then Marlowe could take some ideas from Shakespeare. Since most of the ideas for plays came from famous works anyway, whos to say that Shakespeares idea was even his own?   Ovids Metamorphosis is one of the most referenced works in the plays we have read already in class.